特朗普心急如焚，关税战不但没打赢中国，美国可能要倒赔2万亿

Core Viewpoint - The lawsuit regarding the global tariffs imposed by the Trump administration has been formally submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court, with the current situation appearing unfavorable for Trump [1] Group 1: Case Background - In 2023, the Trump administration imposed large-scale tariffs on various goods, citing "serious trade deficits" and "national security threats" as justifications under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) [3] - The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled in August with a 7-4 majority that the Trump administration's actions may have exceeded the legal authority granted to the president [3] - The case has now reached the Supreme Court, becoming a pivotal issue regarding the division of tariff legislative power between the president and Congress [3] Group 2: Key Legal and Economic Issues - The legal focus of the case centers on whether the IEEPA allows the president to impose tariffs on all imports based solely on a "national emergency" [8] - If the legality of the tariffs is denied, there could be significant financial implications, including the potential return of tariff revenues and compensation claims from affected countries and businesses [6][8] Group 3: Domestic and International Implications - Internationally, Trump's tariff policy has prompted many countries to reassess their trade arrangements with the U.S., and a loss in court could weaken the U.S.'s ability to use tariffs as a diplomatic tool [7] - Domestically, businesses and state governments are concerned about the potential return of tariffs and the associated costs and market uncertainties [7] - The outcome of the lawsuit could significantly impact Trump's economic and political agenda, as it relates to his promises as a "trade hardliner" [7] Group 4: Future Developments and Observations - The Supreme Court's ruling will determine whether Trump's tariff policies are legitimized or if they must revert to Congressional legislation [9] - The ruling could influence trade negotiations between the U.S. and other countries, potentially enhancing the negotiating power of other nations [9] - The case may set a precedent regarding the relationship between executive and legislative powers in U.S. trade policy [9] Conclusion - The ongoing lawsuit regarding global tariffs is not just about tariffs but also encompasses broader issues of presidential power, congressional authorization, and the economic structure of the nation [11]