弃车保帅:上诉最高院一周后戏剧性和解,Epic与谷歌的五年反垄断战火骤熄
3 6 Ke·2025-11-11 10:22

Core Viewpoint - Epic Games and Google have reached a "comprehensive settlement" that may conclude a five-year legal battle regarding Google's Play Store, following a recent Supreme Court filing by Google seeking review of an antitrust ruling against it [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Context - Google submitted a petition to the Supreme Court questioning the applicability of the "rule of reason" in antitrust cases, specifically whether plaintiffs must prove the existence of "less restrictive alternatives" to demonstrate anticompetitive harm [2][3]. - The Ninth Circuit Court allowed a jury to balance interests without the plaintiff fulfilling their burden of proof, which Google argues contradicts established legal standards [3][4]. Group 2: Settlement Analysis - The settlement terms remain confidential but suggest that Epic achieved some significant victories while Google’s concessions may reinforce its core advantages [6][10]. - Google agreed to lower its service fees for in-app purchases, with rates set at 20% for those providing "greater than minimal game advantages" and 9% otherwise, but the complexity of these terms may allow Google to maintain its billing system's attractiveness [6][7]. - The agreement includes modifications to the Android system to simplify the sideloading process, yet Google retains control over the registration of third-party app stores, maintaining its influence over the ecosystem [8][9]. Group 3: Implications for the Industry - The settlement could significantly impact Epic's ongoing litigation against Apple, allowing it to focus resources on that case after resolving its issues with Google [11][12]. - The changes in Google's app store policies may weaken Apple's competitive arguments regarding its own app store, as the market signal suggests that even Google prefers commercial concessions over legal battles [12][13]. - Overall, the settlement represents a commercial compromise rather than a fundamental shift in the system, with terms seemingly tailored for large developers like Epic while potentially consolidating Google's control over the app distribution process [12][13].