以纪检监督赋能生态环境行政执法规范化建设

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of standardized ecological and environmental administrative law enforcement as a crucial means to combat pollution and improve ecological quality, highlighting the need for effective collaboration between disciplinary supervision and administrative law enforcement [1] Group 1: Improvement of Supervision Mechanism - The traditional disciplinary supervision in ecological and environmental law enforcement focuses on accountability for ecological issues, which limits its effectiveness in preventing non-compliance from the source [2] - A full-cycle closed-loop supervision mechanism is proposed, encompassing "prevention before action, control during action, and rectification after action" to enhance the normative and effective nature of law enforcement [2] - Key risk points in the law enforcement process will be identified, with clear responsibilities and timelines established for prevention, control, and rectification [2] Group 2: Reconstruction of Governance Logic - The article advocates for a dual empowerment system that combines supervision with incentives to motivate law enforcement personnel while ensuring compliance [3] - A differentiated management mechanism will be established to allow for tolerance of minor procedural flaws in exploratory law enforcement, preventing excessive accountability that may deter action [3] - The focus will be on transforming problem rectification into institutional improvement, ensuring that lessons learned from enforcement cases lead to broader regulatory enhancements [3] Group 3: Strengthening Education Models - A dual education model combining positive guidance and warning education is recommended, utilizing typical cases to educate law enforcement personnel and reinforce discipline [4] - Regular warning education mechanisms will be established to promote learning from local cases, while exemplary practices will be highlighted to encourage adherence to regulations [4] Group 4: Targeted Supervision in Key Areas - The article stresses the need to focus on high-risk areas and key links in ecological and environmental law enforcement, moving away from a generalized approach to targeted supervision [5] - Special supervision teams will be formed to address high-risk areas such as hazardous waste disposal and heavy metal pollution control, ensuring focused oversight [5] Group 5: Risk Prevention in Key Positions - Establishing dynamic risk profiles for key law enforcement positions will help monitor and mitigate risks associated with long-term assignments [6] - Regular discussions and specialized warning education will be conducted for personnel in critical roles to maintain vigilance against corruption [6] - Concentrated rectification efforts will be directed at prominent issues such as excessive enforcement and power rent-seeking, with clear channels for public reporting established [6]