构建LLM：每个AI项目都需要的知识图谱基础

Core Viewpoint - The case involving attorney Steven Schwartz highlights the critical misunderstanding of the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in legal research, leading to the submission of fabricated court cases and citations [3][4][5]. Group 1: Case Overview - Judge Kevin Castel addressed the submission of six cases by Schwartz, which were later found to be entirely fabricated and non-existent [3][4]. - Schwartz initially believed that LLMs like ChatGPT could serve as reliable legal research tools, equating them to a "super search engine" [4][5]. Group 2: Limitations of LLMs - The case illustrates a fundamental misunderstanding of LLMs' capabilities, particularly in the context of legal research, which requires precise and verifiable information [5][7]. - LLMs are known to produce "hallucinations," or false information, which poses significant risks in fields requiring high accuracy, such as law [5][7][9]. - The architecture of LLMs presents challenges, including lack of transparency, difficulty in updating knowledge, and absence of domain-specific expertise [7][8][9]. Group 3: Knowledge Graphs as a Solution - Knowledge graphs (KGs) are proposed as a solution to enhance the reliability of AI systems by providing structured, verifiable, and up-to-date information [10][12][19]. - KGs support dynamic updates and maintain a clear audit trail, which is essential for accountability in professional environments [12][20]. - The integration of KGs with LLMs can mitigate the risks associated with hallucinations and improve the accuracy of domain-specific applications [19][20]. Group 4: Future of AI in Professional Fields - The future of AI in critical applications, such as legal research, hinges on the development of intelligent advisory systems that combine the strengths of KGs and LLMs [21]. - Professionals deploying AI tools must ensure that their systems support accountability and accuracy, rather than undermine them [21].