“网格兜不住事儿”，如何改出实效（干部状态新观察·走进一线探作风）

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges and improvements in grassroots conflict resolution and management in Xingan County, Jiangxi Province, highlighting the transition to a more effective grid management system to address local issues and enhance community services [1][2]. Group 1: Challenges in Initial Grid Management - Xingan County initially implemented a grid management system with only 20 grids for a population of nearly 120,000, leading to ineffective problem resolution due to insufficient coverage and depth of engagement [1]. - Grid workers faced overwhelming workloads, needing to fulfill multiple roles and responsibilities, which made it difficult to manage effectively [2]. - There was a lack of clear boundaries regarding responsibilities, with various departments imposing additional tasks on grid workers, complicating their ability to address community issues [2]. Group 2: Improvements and Reforms - The county has restructured its grid management into a 3.0 version, increasing the number of grids to 506 and integrating various departments into a unified management system to streamline problem-solving [2][4]. - A clear delineation of responsibilities has been established, allowing grid workers to focus on their core tasks while reducing unnecessary burdens [4]. - The introduction of a "small micro-fund" project has provided financial support for community issues, enabling quick responses to local needs, such as infrastructure maintenance [5]. Group 3: Outcomes and Effectiveness - The new management system has led to a significant reduction in unresolved conflicts, with a reported 245 out of 249 conflicts successfully resolved through the new intelligent warning platform [6]. - The county has seen a 42.3% decrease in criminal incidents and a 25% increase in proactive policing interventions, indicating improved safety and community engagement [6]. - The reforms have resulted in tangible benefits for residents, with quick resolutions to minor issues enhancing community satisfaction and trust in local governance [5].