江宇舟：高市早苗如此盼望“有事”，就让她体验一下“多事之秋”

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the provocative actions and statements made by Japan's new Prime Minister, Sanna Takashi, regarding Taiwan and China, highlighting the potential legal violations and the deterioration of Sino-Japanese relations [1][2]. Group 1: Provocative Actions - Sanna Takashi met with Taiwanese representatives shortly after APEC talks with China, which led to strong protests from China [1]. - Takashi's statements in the Japanese Diet suggested that any military action by China against Taiwan could trigger Japan's collective self-defense rights, which has drawn criticism [1][2]. - The awarding of the Order of the Rising Sun to Taiwanese politician Hsieh Chang-ting further escalated tensions [1]. Group 2: Legal Violations - Takashi's actions are seen as a violation of Japan's post-war constitution, particularly Article 9, which renounces war and the use of force [6]. - The statements made by Takashi contradict Japan's own security laws, which were modified under former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to allow collective self-defense [2][5]. - The provocative rhetoric undermines the 1978 Treaty of Peace and Friendship between China and Japan, which emphasizes mutual respect for sovereignty and non-interference in internal affairs [8]. Group 3: Historical Context - The article emphasizes Japan's historical amnesia regarding its wartime actions and its current threats against China, which are viewed as a significant escalation [9]. - The narrative suggests that Japan's current government is attempting to shift its internal contradictions outward, leading to increased tensions with China [2]. Group 4: Economic and Military Implications - The article outlines potential economic responses from China, including tightening export controls on critical minerals and limiting imports from Japan [13]. - It discusses the possibility of military exercises near Japan as a countermeasure to Takashi's threats, indicating a shift in China's military posture [14][19]. - The article suggests that Japan's actions could lead to a reevaluation of the U.S.-Japan security alliance, particularly in light of Japan's provocative stance [20].