“自我纠错”会带来负面影响吗？如何借此提升执法质效？

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of "self-correction" in administrative inspections related to enterprises, highlighting the need for improved awareness, capability, and mechanisms to enhance the effectiveness of these inspections [1][2][3] Group 1: Self-Correction in Administrative Inspections - A specific case from Hubei province revealed that an environmental agency conducted 75 inspections on a chemical enterprise within two years, indicating excessive frequency of checks [1] - The self-correction initiative by the agency is seen as a positive step towards enhancing problem awareness and promoting timely and effective rectification [1] - There are concerns that some local departments lack a strong self-correction awareness, viewing it as solely the responsibility of supervisory bodies, which hinders proactive self-assessment [1] Group 2: Enhancing Self-Correction Effectiveness - To improve the effectiveness of self-correction, it is essential to establish a normalized mechanism, enhance capabilities, and instill a strong awareness among enforcement personnel [2] - Local governments and supervisory departments should provide guidance and implement measures to alleviate concerns regarding self-correction, ensuring a supportive environment for such initiatives [2] - The creation of a capable inspection team that can accurately identify issues and facilitate rectification is crucial, utilizing both online and offline methods to gather enterprise feedback [2] Group 3: Implementation of Self-Correction Plans - Local units should develop annual self-correction plans for administrative inspections, outlining goals, procedures, responsible parties, and necessary support measures [3] - Establishing a dynamic platform for collecting and addressing inspection issues can enhance the self-correction process, allowing for continuous improvement [3] - It is important to document and institutionalize successful practices to refine the self-correction mechanism over time [3]