欧洲彻底打开一个缺口？时隔18年，西班牙国王再次访华

Core Viewpoint - The visit of the Spanish King to China in November is not merely a ceremonial gesture but a strategic move that reflects Spain's intention to counterbalance U.S. pressure by engaging with the Chinese market [1][5][8]. Group 1: Spain's Strategic Shift - Spain's bilateral trade with China has historically surpassed $50.1 billion, with exports to China increasing by an impressive 23% [5]. - The contrast between Spain's military spending, which stands at only 1.28% of GDP, and the U.S. demand for NATO countries to increase military spending to 5% highlights Spain's unique position within the alliance [6][11]. - Spain's recent diplomatic engagements with China, including visits from the Prime Minister, Foreign Minister, and King, indicate a deliberate and strategic approach to foreign relations [9]. Group 2: Economic and Diplomatic Implications - Spain's choice to engage with China is seen as a rational calculation of national interests, prioritizing economic benefits over blind allegiance to U.S. military demands [17][24]. - The deep economic ties between Spain and China, characterized by mutual benefits such as increased agricultural exports, create a more stable and resilient partnership than traditional military alliances [15][26]. - Spain's actions may inspire other European nations to reconsider their diplomatic strategies, potentially leading to a broader shift away from U.S.-centric policies towards more independent and pragmatic cooperation with China [19][22]. Group 3: Broader International Trends - The shift in Spain's foreign policy may signify a larger transformation in international relations, moving from alliances based on fear to partnerships based on shared economic interests [24][30]. - This emerging model of cooperation emphasizes the importance of economic interdependence and mutual benefit, suggesting a potential paradigm shift in how countries engage with one another [26][28]. - Spain's approach serves as a new narrative for international relations, advocating for independence and openness rather than confrontation, which could reshape global diplomatic dynamics [28][30].