科达制造存公司治理黑洞?无实控人下疑遭内部人掏空 关联交易被质疑是否存利益输送

Core Viewpoint - Keda Manufacturing's Q3 report shows significant growth in performance, raising questions about whether it is a worthy investment, especially given concerns about internal governance and potential insider exploitation [1][2]. Financial Performance - The company reported Q3 revenue of 12.605 billion, a year-on-year increase of 47.19%, and a net profit attributable to shareholders of 1.149 billion, up 63.49%. The operating cash flow net amount reached 1.560 billion, a staggering increase of 65 times [2]. - For Q3 alone, revenue was 4.417 billion, reflecting a 43.89% year-on-year growth, while net profit was 404 million, up 62.65% [2]. Governance Issues - Keda Manufacturing has been accused of internal exploitation, with findings from the China Securities Regulatory Commission revealing issues such as off-the-books payments and improper salary distributions to executives [3][4]. - The company has engaged in off-the-books transactions through employees' personal accounts, affecting reported profits by 0.12% to 1.09% over various periods [4]. - There have been violations regarding the distribution of executive salaries, which were not approved by the board or disclosed properly [5]. Related Party Transactions - The company has faced scrutiny over related party transactions, with concerns about potential profit transfer to related parties. The gross profit margin from these transactions is significantly lower than that from third-party sales, indicating possible issues with pricing fairness [8][9]. - Specific transactions include related purchases and sales with entities controlled by board members, raising questions about their legitimacy and fairness [8][9]. Lack of Control - Keda Manufacturing has not had a controlling shareholder since 2016, leading to a fragmented ownership structure. The largest shareholder holds only 19.52% of the shares, with the second-largest at 8.01% [10]. - This lack of a controlling entity may contribute to governance weaknesses and internal control issues [10]. Accountability and Disclosure - Several executives have been held accountable for the company's governance failures, with a significant drop in disclosure quality, resulting in a downgrade of the company's disclosure rating from B to D [12].