12.7万枚比特币“黑吃黑”背后：加密货币的安全困局与洗钱暗网

Core Insights - The article discusses the significant rise in the value of 127,000 Bitcoins, from $3.5 billion five years ago to $15 billion today, linked to a hacking incident involving the LuBian mining pool and the subsequent seizure by the U.S. government, highlighting the complexities of cryptocurrency security and crime [2][7]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The LuBian mining pool was hacked on December 29, 2020, resulting in the theft of approximately 127,000 Bitcoins, valued at around $3.5 billion at the time, which has now increased to $15 billion [2][4]. - The stolen Bitcoins were linked to Chen Zhi, the chairman of the Cambodian Prince Group, who attempted to negotiate with the hackers for their return but received no response [4][6]. - The U.S. government announced the seizure of these Bitcoins in October 2025, claiming they were obtained through hacking, indicating a "black eats black" scenario [2][5]. Group 2: Security Implications - The incident reveals vulnerabilities in the security of non-custodial wallets, which are often perceived as safe havens for cryptocurrency [3][5]. - The LuBian mining pool's private key generation algorithm was flawed, relying on a 32-bit random number instead of the recommended 256-bit standard, making it easier for hackers to exploit [5][6]. - The event underscores the importance of robust cybersecurity measures in the digital economy and the need for better random number generation practices in cryptocurrency systems [6][9]. Group 3: Criminal Activity and Money Laundering - Chen Zhi's operations involved a complex money laundering scheme utilizing Bitcoin, with a significant portion of illicit funds being funneled through various transactions to evade detection [8][10]. - The global scale of cryptocurrency-related money laundering has reached over $120 billion, accounting for 15% of criminal financial flows, indicating a growing trend in the use of digital currencies for illegal activities [8][10]. - The article emphasizes the challenges faced by law enforcement in tracking and regulating cryptocurrency transactions due to the anonymity and cross-border nature of these assets [9][10].