DSL(SH:603233) Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-11-14 13:42Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent exposure of a chain pharmacy, Dacianlin, for selling ordinary consumer products disguised as medical devices, allowing them to be reimbursed by health insurance, raising concerns about compliance and regulatory scrutiny in the industry [2][6]. Group 1: Company Overview - Dacianlin operates a large chain of pharmacies, with over 17,000 stores as of September 2023, making it the largest pharmacy chain in terms of store count in China [6]. - The company reported non-pharmaceutical revenue of 2.948 billion yuan in 2024, with a gross margin of 42%, which is 9 percentage points higher than its average gross margin of 32.74% [6]. - Dacianlin's sales contract with the manufacturer of the disputed products amounts to nearly 900 million yuan [6]. Group 2: Regulatory Issues - The company has faced multiple instances of non-compliance with health insurance fund usage, with violations including improper billing practices and inclusion of non-reimbursable items in insurance claims [7][8]. - Dacianlin has implemented a "direct management franchise" model to strengthen control over franchise stores, requiring all products to be sourced from the company [8]. - Despite these measures, violations have continued, leading to penalties and fines for various stores [8]. Group 3: Market Context - The practice of misclassifying consumer goods as medical devices to benefit from insurance reimbursement has become common in the industry, with several other major pharmacy chains also implicated [6]. - The tightening of health insurance regulations is expected to increase scrutiny on such practices, potentially impacting the business model of companies like Dacianlin [6]. Group 4: Information Disclosure and Corporate Governance - Dacianlin's information disclosure rating improved to B grade from D grade, reflecting past issues with timely disclosures related to legal matters involving its actual controller [9]. - The company faced regulatory actions for failing to disclose critical information promptly, leading to penalties and a requirement for internal accountability measures [10].