这样的伎俩，中国人见过太多

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses allegations made by the U.S. government against Alibaba, claiming that the company provides technological support to the Chinese military for actions targeting the U.S. However, the report lacks specific details and has been criticized as unfounded by both Alibaba and the Chinese embassy in the U.S. [1][2] Group 1: Allegations and Responses - The U.S. White House accused Alibaba of providing technical support to the Chinese military, but the report did not specify the capabilities or actions involved [1] - Alibaba issued a strong statement denying the allegations, questioning the motives behind the anonymous leak and labeling it as a malicious public relations campaign [1] - The Chinese embassy in the U.S. refuted the claims, stating that the accusations were baseless and irresponsible [1][2] Group 2: Context of the Allegations - The allegations come amid reports that Alibaba has launched the "Qwen" project, creating a personal AI assistant app that competes directly with ChatGPT [3] - Concerns among U.S. tech giants have increased due to the competitive nature of Alibaba's AI developments, particularly the open-source nature of its models [5] Group 3: Impact on the AI Industry - The Qwen model has gained significant traction, with over 600 million downloads and more than 170,000 derivative models, surpassing previous leaders in the open-source AI space [6] - The rise of Alibaba's Qwen has led to a "Qwen Panic" among U.S. tech companies, prompting some to reconsider their strategies in the face of competitive pressure [6] - The article emphasizes that AI should be viewed as a public good, and the politicization of technology competition could hinder global technological progress [7][8] Group 4: Future Implications - The article suggests that the U.S. and China, as the world's two largest economies, have a responsibility to set an example for global tech governance and should focus on cooperation rather than confrontation in the AI sector [8]