Summary of Alibaba Group Holding Conference Call Company Overview - **Company**: Alibaba Group Holding (BABA.N) - **Industry**: China Internet and Other Services - **Market Cap**: US$289,721 million - **Current Share Price**: US$121.98 (as of March 30, 2026) - **Price Target**: US$180.00, indicating a potential upside of 48% [7][69] Key Points Cloud Services - **Price Increase**: A cloud price hike is expected to drive near-term growth, with long-term margins projected to remain at 20% [1][10] - **Revenue Growth**: The cloud segment is projected to achieve a revenue of US$100 billion over five years, implying a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of over 44% [10] - **Market Share**: The company aims for Managed as a Service (MaaS) to constitute more than 50% of cloud revenue, as it has higher margins than Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) [10] - **Component Costs**: The price hike is primarily due to increases in component costs, effective from April 2026 [10] AI and Applications - **Investment Priority**: AI remains the highest priority for investments, with a total addressable market (TAM) for AI projected to reach US$6 trillion, representing 30% of China's GDP [10] - **Qwen App**: The Qwen app has achieved 44 million daily active users (DAU), peaking at 77 million after promotions during the Chinese New Year [10][12] - **Monetization Strategy**: Building a consumer-facing agent is deemed strategically important for future monetization, with a current combined take rate from ads and commissions in the mid to high single digits [10][12] Quick Commerce - **Loss Reduction**: Quick commerce losses are narrowing quarter-over-quarter for both Alibaba and Meituan, with March quarter losses expected to be lower than December [5][12] - **Focus on Growth**: The company will continue to drive gross merchandise volume (GMV) growth and market share by increasing average order value (AOV) [5] Financial Performance - **Earnings Projections**: - EPS for FY 2026 is projected at RMB 41.72, down from RMB 53.59 in FY 2025 [7] - Revenue is expected to grow from RMB 996 billion in FY 2025 to RMB 1,024 billion in FY 2026 [7] - Net income is projected to decrease from RMB 129 billion in FY 2025 to RMB 99 billion in FY 2026 [7] Risks and Challenges - **Market Competition**: Increased competition and higher-than-expected reinvestment costs pose risks to growth [15] - **Regulatory Scrutiny**: Ongoing regulatory scrutiny of internet platforms could impact operations [15] - **Economic Conditions**: Weaker consumption and a slower post-COVID recovery may hinder growth [15] Investment Outlook - **Stock Rating**: The stock is rated as "Overweight," indicating a favorable outlook compared to the industry [7] - **Valuation Methodology**: The valuation is based on a discounted cash flow model with a 10% weighted average cost of capital (WACC) and a 3% terminal growth rate [13] Additional Insights - **International Revenue**: Currently, less than 20% of Alicloud revenue comes from overseas, but this is expected to increase [10] - **Production Capacity**: A key hurdle for growth is production capacity from fabs, with costs lower than competitors like NVIDIA [10] This summary encapsulates the critical insights from the conference call, highlighting Alibaba's strategic focus on cloud services, AI, and quick commerce, while also addressing potential risks and financial projections.

March 30, 2026 10:00 PM GMT China Equity Strategy Launching China Best Business Models Version 2 We identify 26 best business models in China with sustainable competitive advantages to drive outperformance using the expertise of Morgan Stanley's fundamental, quant, and thematic research. These stocks offer ROE 1.5x higher than the benchmark with a back-tested 3-year Sharpe Ratio of 1.2. An approach worth repeating: We have made identifying Best Business Models a core part of the research franchise for two r ...

Summary of Key Points from the Conference Call on China Internet and AI Model Architecture Industry Overview - The focus of the discussion is on the **China Internet** sector, particularly the strategic implications of AI model architecture and the competitive landscape among leading AI labs such as **Minimax**, **Z.ai**, and **Alibaba**'s **Qwen** models [1][8][13]. Core Insights and Arguments AI Model Architecture - **Strategic Choices**: The architecture of AI models is influenced by strategic choices that affect market positioning and go-to-market strategies [1][8]. - **MoE Architectures**: There is a growing trend among global AI developers to adopt **Mixture-of-Experts (MoE)** architectures, which activate only a subset of parameters per token, enhancing efficiency and specialization [2][14]. - **KV Cache**: The **Key Value (KV) cache** is crucial for reducing memory usage and improving inference speed, allowing for efficient reuse of prior inputs during AI model operations [2][17]. Cost vs. Performance - **Minimax**: Offers smaller models optimized for low active parameter scale per token, with a pricing strategy that encourages high KV cache usage [3][19]. - **Z.ai**: Features larger models with better general reasoning and coding capabilities but at higher token costs [3][19]. - **Qwen**: Aims to provide a broad range of models to capture diverse AI compute demands, reflecting Alibaba's extensive resources [8][66]. Adoption Curve and Market Dynamics - **Adoption Trends**: The M2.5 model from Minimax has gained popularity for its low-cost agentic use, while Z.ai's focus on reasoning aligns with enterprise needs [4][21]. - **Competition**: The market for low-cost AI solutions is becoming increasingly crowded, with competition from both domestic developers and global leaders [5][47]. - **Training Costs**: Rising compute costs are expected to pressure inference margins and training costs, with estimates of 20-30% growth in training costs potentially being too low [6][10][72]. Important but Overlooked Aspects - **Market Tightness**: Recent price hikes by major players like Alibaba, Tencent, and Baidu indicate a tightening market for AI compute resources, which could lead to further price increases [6][74]. - **Consumer Behavior**: The focus on efficiency and cost-effectiveness in consumer use cases may overshadow the importance of advanced reasoning capabilities in AI models [9][27]. - **Future Developments**: The evolution of AI applications, including collaborative agents and agentic thinking, is expected to shape future market dynamics and user engagement [24][26]. Financial Metrics and Valuation - **Valuation Comparisons**: The report includes a valuation comparison table for major players in the China Internet sector, highlighting adjusted EPS and P/E ratios for companies like Tencent and Alibaba [7][11]. - **Investment Implications**: The ongoing discussions around AI development and costs suggest that investors should closely monitor the strategic choices made by leading AI labs and their implications for market positioning [8][13]. This summary encapsulates the key points discussed in the conference call, providing insights into the competitive landscape and strategic considerations within the China Internet and AI sectors.

Core Insights - Chinese GPU and AI chip makers captured nearly 41% of China's AI accelerator server market in 2025, significantly reducing Nvidia's market dominance [2][5] - The shift is attributed to China's increasing caution about reliance on foreign chips, leading to a push for domestic alternatives amid U.S. export controls [3][5] Market Share Dynamics - Nvidia remains the market leader with approximately 2.2 million AI accelerator cards shipped, holding a 55% market share, but this represents a decline from its previous dominance [4][7] - Chinese vendors collectively shipped 1.65 million cards, marking a significant milestone in the market, with Huawei leading at around 812,000 cards, followed by Alibaba's T-Head with approximately 265,000 cards [5][6] Competitive Landscape - Baidu's Kunlunxin and Cambricon each shipped around 116,000 cards, ranking them jointly third among Chinese vendors [6] - Other Chinese vendors like Hygon, MetaX, and Iluvatar CoreX accounted for 5%, 4%, and 3% of total shipments, respectively [6] Government Initiatives - In 2025, the central government initiated a new wave of AI infrastructure spending, encouraging local governments to accelerate the establishment of intelligent computing centers with directives to prioritize domestic products [6]

证券研究报告 行业研究 / 行业深度 2026 年 04 月 01 日 电子 / 消费电子 强于大市 投资要点： 一年内行业指数与沪深 300 指数对比走势： 资料来源：聚源数据，爱建证券研究所 相关研究 范林泉 S0820525020001 021-32229888-25516 fanlinquan@ajzq.com 许亮 S0820525010002 0755-83562506 xuliang@ajzq.com 行业及产业 从技术融合到生态构建，把握穿戴智能化新浪潮 ——AI 眼镜行业深度报告 - 行业 2023 年以来迎来爆发式增长，但仍处培育期，增长空间广阔。AI 眼镜是技术融合下的 智能穿戴新形态，相较 AR、VR、XR 智能眼镜，是当前最具大众普及潜力的近眼终端，2023 年以来行业迎来爆发式增长，2023-2025 年全球销量从 24 万台暴增至 766 万台，核心驱动 力源于端侧大模型落地、硬件技术升级以及巨头入局。当前行业仍处培育期，定价集中于中 高端区间，未覆盖大众消费群体，海外市场占主导地位，中国市场仍处于产品导入与用户教 育的早期阶段，渗透率低，但增长强劲，未来随着供应链成熟与价格带下 ...

Group 1 - The Nasdaq Golden Dragon Index (HXC) rose by 2.8% on April 1, with most Chinese concept stocks experiencing gains [1][4] - Notable gainers included TSMC up 6.78%, Alibaba up 2.88%, Pinduoduo up 3.82%, and NIO up 9.26% [1][4] - Decliners included Beike down 0.27%, Tencent Music down 0.32%, and China New Town down 4.96% [1][4] Group 2 - On a broader scale, U.S. stock indices saw significant gains on a Tuesday, with the Dow Jones rising by 1,125.19 points (2.49%) [2][5] - Despite the daily gains, all three major U.S. indices recorded declines in the first quarter, with the Nasdaq down over 7%, S&P 500 down 4.6%, and Dow Jones down approximately 3.6% [2][5] - In March, the Dow Jones fell about 5.4%, S&P 500 down 5.1%, and Nasdaq down 4.75% [3][6]

Core Insights - The four major e-commerce companies, Alibaba, JD.com, Pinduoduo, and Meituan, reported their 2025 financial results, showcasing a mix of revenue growth and profit declines, with some companies opting for long-term strategies over immediate profits [1][20][21]. Revenue Performance - JD.com led in revenue with 1.3091 trillion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 12.97%, followed by Alibaba at 1.0167 trillion yuan, growing approximately 3.56%. Pinduoduo reported 431.8 billion yuan, up 9.65%, while Meituan reached 364.9 billion yuan, growing 8.08% [2][22][24]. - JD.com demonstrated the highest revenue growth rate, indicating strong growth momentum, while Alibaba's slower growth reflects competitive pressures in its core e-commerce business [25]. Profitability Trends - All four companies experienced a decline in net profits. Alibaba's net profit fell by 23.78% to 92.164 billion yuan, Pinduoduo's decreased by 11.62% to 99.4 billion yuan, JD.com reported a 52.54% drop to 19.6 billion yuan, and Meituan shifted from a profit of 35.8 billion yuan to a net loss of 23.5 billion yuan, marking the most significant deterioration [2][27][26]. Marketing Expenditures - Alibaba's marketing expenses surged to 191.6 billion yuan, a 77.67% increase, making it the highest among the four companies. Meituan's marketing costs reached 102.9 billion yuan, up 60.9%, while JD.com spent 83.95 billion yuan, increasing by 75.07%. Pinduoduo's marketing expenses were 125.3 billion yuan, with a more moderate growth of 12.57% [8][28][29]. - The significant rise in marketing expenses reflects the competitive landscape, with companies engaging in aggressive strategies to maintain market share [30]. Strategic Focus for 2026 - Alibaba is focusing on "AI + Instant Retail" to enhance user engagement and retention, leveraging its full-stack AI capabilities [36]. - JD.com aims to maintain double-digit growth in its core retail business while reducing losses in its new ventures, emphasizing international expansion and AI integration [37]. - Pinduoduo is shifting its strategy towards upgrading the Chinese supply chain, focusing on long-term value creation rather than immediate user growth [38]. - Meituan is transitioning from aggressive expansion to defending market share, prioritizing high-quality growth and AI investments [39]. Industry Outlook - The e-commerce sector is moving away from the "subsidy for growth" model towards a focus on technology-driven, efficiency-first competition, with an emphasis on sustainable long-term strategies [39].

在无人驾驶汽车还无法普及的情况下，AI打车是AI技术全面介 入日常生活的一个试验场。长期来看，随着自动驾驶技术的成 熟和法规框架的完善，AI打车与自动驾驶的合流有可能重构整 个出行生态。 作者：濮振宇 封图：滴滴 3月24日，北京一位用户打开滴滴出行App，对着新上线的"滴滴AI叫车"说："我现在要从家去北 京南站，还有一个老人和一个孩子，一定要空气清新。"几秒钟后，系统便匹配出多辆带有"车内 宽敞""驾驶平稳""无异味"等服务标签的车辆。 3月26日，杭州一位用户对阿里旗下千问App说："帮我打车去灵隐寺，但我要先去宋城门口接个 朋友。"系统自动理解了两个地点的先后顺序，一次性生成了包含途经点的网约车订单。 最近半个月，中国出行市场发生两件类似的事情，一是滴滴AI出行助手小滴v1.0版本正式上线， 覆盖扶老携幼、商务接待等更复杂的出行场景，二是阿里旗下千问上线AI打车功能，可一句话完成 选车型、添加途经点、预约时间等操作。 在点外卖、订酒店之后，打车——这个高频、刚需、低容错的物理世界服务场景，成为大厂AI竞赛 的新战场。 AI打车靠什么吸引用户 滴滴这样的网约车平台为什么要做AI打车？从表面上看，这是一次 ...

Core Insights - Major instant retail platforms reported significant losses in their 2025 financials, with Meituan losing 23.4 billion, JD's new business losing 46.6 billion, and Alibaba losing over 37.6 billion in a single quarter, totaling over 100 billion in losses among the three giants [1][2][3] Group 1: Market Dynamics - The instant retail market reached 971.4 billion in 2025, growing at a rate of 24%, indicating that the market is expanding rather than contracting [6] - The competition has shifted from merely burning cash to achieving speed while maintaining stability [7] - Meituan focuses on maintaining a large network of over 600,000 riders, achieving over 50% market share at the cost of a 6.9 billion loss [8] - Alibaba aims to leverage high-frequency delivery to drive traffic to its lower-frequency e-commerce business, resulting in a 37.6 billion loss but achieving 120 million daily orders [9] - JD is positioning itself as a quality delivery service, incurring a 46.6 billion loss to establish a brand perception of quality [10] Group 2: Implications for Businesses - The reduction in platform subsidies means that businesses must learn to attract and retain customers independently [12][13] - Cost management becomes crucial, as businesses need to analyze which products are profitable and which are not [14] - With reduced subsidies, consumers will become more price-sensitive, necessitating a focus on inventory management and product selection [15] Group 3: Strategic Insights - The competition has evolved from speed to stability, with companies needing to find their unique positioning in the market [18] - Meituan's strategy emphasizes scale as a competitive advantage, suggesting that local businesses should aim for comprehensive coverage within their vicinity [19][20] - Alibaba's approach indicates that high-frequency products can drive sales of lower-frequency items, encouraging businesses to bundle products effectively [21] - JD's focus on quality suggests that there is a market for premium products, even in a price-sensitive environment [22] Group 4: Future Outlook - The industry will shift its focus from how much money was burned to what value was created [25][28] - Companies that survive this competitive landscape will be those that adapt to new methods of accounting and operational efficiency [27]

Group 1 - Huawei's development of its own AI chip has not yet resulted in significant revenue growth compared to its competitors, as the company aims to close the gap with U.S. firms in the AI sector [1] - Revenue from external cloud computing customers decreased by 3.5% in 2025, totaling 32.16 billion yuan ($4.6 billion) [1] - Huawei remains the second-largest cloud provider in mainland China despite the decline in external cloud revenue [1] Group 2 - Overall cloud revenue, including internal customers, increased by 4.8% to 72.8 billion yuan, indicating some growth in the broader cloud segment [2] - The ICT infrastructure segment, which includes Huawei's Ascend AI chip solutions, experienced a slowdown in revenue growth to 2.6%, down from 4.9% in 2024 [2] - Huawei's total ICT revenue for 2025 reached 375.01 billion yuan, reflecting the company's overall performance in the technology sector [2]