“太子集团”天价比特币，被美国“黑吃黑”？

Core Insights - A significant development has emerged regarding the theft of approximately 127,000 bitcoins, valued at around $15 billion, which occurred four years ago. The recent report from the National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center indicates that the stolen bitcoins have remained dormant, suggesting the involvement of a state-level hacking organization rather than typical criminal behavior [1][4]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The bitcoins were originally owned by Chen Zhi, chairman of the Cambodian Prince Group, who is currently facing charges from the U.S. Department of Justice for telecom fraud and money laundering. The DOJ has announced the seizure of the 127,000 bitcoins, which are believed to be the stolen assets from the LuBian mining pool hack in December 2020 [1][4][13]. - The LuBian mining pool, linked to the Prince Group, suffered a major attack in December 2020, resulting in the theft of over 90% of its bitcoin holdings, totaling approximately 127,272 BTC, which aligns closely with the amount mentioned in the DOJ's indictment [4][6]. Group 2: Technical Analysis - The report highlights that the stolen bitcoins were stored in non-custodial wallets, which are considered secure as they are not subject to freezing by legal orders. The private keys for these wallets were compromised due to a "pseudo-random number vulnerability," allowing hackers to execute the theft in under two hours [4][8]. - The bitcoins remained inactive until June 2024, when they were transferred to new addresses, which have since been marked as held by the U.S. government. This indicates a successful tracing of the stolen assets through blockchain analysis [6][8]. Group 3: Legal and Regulatory Implications - The DOJ's actions against Chen Zhi and the Prince Group have raised questions about the legality of the seizure process, as bitcoin is recognized as a legal asset in many jurisdictions. The legitimacy of the seizure's judicial support is under scrutiny [1][4]. - The case underscores the increasing scrutiny and regulatory measures surrounding cryptocurrencies, as the U.S. government is progressively incorporating digital currencies into its regulatory framework, which may limit the operational space for cryptocurrencies outside of regulation [16].