租机平台青云租陷兑付危机：集资与放贷的双面生意

Core Viewpoint - The news highlights the collapse of the mobile rental platform Qingyun Rent, operated by Wuhan Qingqing Times Network Technology Co., Ltd, which has left over 600 investors trapped with more than 300 million yuan in funds, as the company allegedly engaged in fraudulent activities disguised as a legitimate rental business [2][3][4]. Group 1: Company Operations and Promises - Qingyun Rent promised investors an annualized return of 16.8% by converting their investments into mobile phones for rental purposes, creating an illusion of high demand and profitability [2][5][14]. - The company claimed to purchase iPhones at a lower price and rent them out, assuring investors of returns after deducting operational costs [6][14]. - Despite the platform appearing operational, investors faced withdrawal issues starting from late September, leading to protests outside the company's office [3][7]. Group 2: Allegations of Fraud - Investigations revealed that Qingyun Rent may not have actually purchased phones for rental but instead used fake logistics to create the appearance of legitimate operations, while engaging in high-interest lending practices with rates as high as 200% annually [3][4][37]. - Employees reported that the company operated more like a lending institution under the guise of a rental service, lacking the necessary financial licenses [37][40]. - The company’s claims of having a strong background with state-owned capital and plans for an IPO were found to be misleading, as the actual financial health of its parent company was poor [27][28][30]. Group 3: Investor Experiences and Reactions - Many investors, driven by the promise of high returns and low entry barriers, invested significant amounts, often using loans or borrowing from friends and family [9][13][21]. - Following the platform's collapse, investors reported difficulties in withdrawing funds, with some receiving only partial repayments after signing agreements to accept delayed payments [10][41]. - The situation has led to numerous complaints and police investigations, with many investors now seeking legal recourse [41][42].