从“内卷”到“竞合”：大模型时代，开源社区能否带领国产OS“场景突围”？

Core Insights - The article discusses the transformative impact of AI on traditional computing systems, particularly focusing on the evolution of the Anolis OS and the broader domestic software industry in China [2][11] - It highlights the shift from a stable replacement of operating systems to a co-evolution with AI, emphasizing the need for a new definition of operating systems in the AI era [2][11] Group 1: AI's Impact on Operating Systems - AI is reshaping the definition of operating systems from mere resource managers to active "transmission devices" that efficiently organize and schedule heterogeneous resources [5][11] - The new operating systems must support complex applications driven by AI models, requiring advanced memory and tool usage capabilities [4][6] - The demand for managing diverse computing resources, including GPUs and AI chips, presents new technical challenges for operating systems [4][6] Group 2: Domestic Operating Systems' Challenges and Opportunities - Domestic operating systems like Anolis and OpenEuler face a global competitiveness gap compared to top international systems, particularly in unified ecosystem representation [6][7] - However, the inability to rely on a single dominant computing supply has led domestic systems to develop unique experiences in supporting diverse computing environments [7][8] - The complexity of scenarios faced by Chinese enterprises provides domestic operating systems with a natural advantage in handling intricate systems [7][8] Group 3: Advantages of Open Source and Community Collaboration - The deep integration of open source with domestic operating systems enhances their ability to innovate collaboratively among various manufacturers [7][10] - Sustainable commercial investment is crucial for the long-term viability of open source communities, ensuring continuous iteration and development [7][10] - The growth of the Longxin community from 100 to 1000 partners illustrates the strong demand for collaborative solutions across the domestic industry [8][10] Group 4: Competitive and Cooperative Dynamics - The competition among domestic operating systems is characterized by a complex interplay of cooperation and competition, rather than a simple replacement model [8][10] - Multiple communities are necessary to address the diverse needs of the domestic industry, allowing for parallel development without hindering each other [8][10] - The focus should be on creating a "systemic prosperity" rather than a singular dominance, fostering a collaborative ecosystem [10][11] Group 5: Future Directions and Strategic Focus - The path for domestic operating systems involves leveraging open models to drive hardware and OS standards, facilitating a shift away from hardware dependency [10][11] - The ongoing evolution of computing paradigms and the need for high-level cooperation among communities will define the future of domestic operating systems [11][12] - The article concludes that the journey of domestic operating systems is a continuous process of conflict, cooperation, and evolution, positioning them as active participants in the AI-driven transformation [11][12]