G20风光不再，中美俄领导人罕见一起缺席，全球格局已悄然大变！

Group 1 - The G20 summit faced significant attendance issues, with key leaders from the US, Russia, and China absent, highlighting a decline in global cooperation [1][3] - The G20's effectiveness has diminished over the years, with only five agreements reached compared to eighteen in 2009, reflecting a lack of financial commitment from member countries [4][5] - The rise of RCEP, comprising 15 countries and accounting for 30% of global GDP, indicates a shift towards regional trade agreements, with China expected to see a 4.5% growth in trade with RCEP partners by 2025 [7][12] Group 2 - The establishment of the new version of the China-ASEAN Free Trade Area aims to strengthen supply chains, while countries like Indonesia and Nigeria are joining BRICS, enhancing the influence of emerging economies [9][11] - The New Development Bank (NDB) is expanding, alongside other regional financial institutions, as southern countries begin to create their own rules for economic cooperation [11][12] - The African Union's inclusion as the 21st member of the G20 marks a significant shift, with African financial issues being prioritized, indicating a growing voice for southern nations in global discussions [12][15] Group 3 - The contrasting approaches of the US and southern countries illustrate a move towards decentralized trade agreements, with the US focusing on bilateral deals while southern nations pursue regional cooperation [13][15] - Experts predict a fragmented global trade landscape in the next three to five years, characterized by a lack of unified rules and increased regional collaboration [13][15] - The absence of key leaders at the G20 symbolizes a broader decline in the traditional multilateral dialogue, with empty chairs representing the lost influence of the G20 format [15]