从没见过如此厚颜无耻之人：美国如何将12.7万枚比特币的窃取“合法化”

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the dramatic turn of events surrounding the "LuBian" Bitcoin mining pool hack, where a significant amount of Bitcoin was stolen and later seized by the U.S. government, raising questions about the legitimacy and motives behind the seizure [1][3]. Technical Vulnerabilities - The LuBian mining pool suffered from a critical flaw in its key generation process, using the Mersenne Twister (MT19937) algorithm, which allowed for the predictable generation of private keys, significantly reducing the difficulty of cracking them from 2^256 to approximately 2^32 [1][2]. - U.S. authorities exploited this vulnerability through systematic "weak chain attacks," identifying around 30% of small to medium platforms with similar security flaws, leading to the successful transfer of 127,426 Bitcoins [2]. Judicial Manipulation - The U.S. government strategically targeted the Cambodian Prince Group as a scapegoat to legitimize the seizure of the Bitcoins, diverting public attention from the original theft and focusing on the group's alleged illegal activities [3]. - The evidence presented in the judicial process was criticized for being weak and hastily assembled, indicating a rushed attempt to cover up the origins of the seized assets [3]. Strategic Intent - The operation was not merely a law enforcement action but part of a broader political and economic strategy to alleviate the U.S. federal debt, which exceeded $36 trillion by 2025, and to utilize cryptocurrency as a financial tool [4][6]. - The seizure of the Bitcoins is seen as a method to generate revenue with minimal costs, as the process involves technical hacking followed by legal proceedings for asset transfer [6]. Long-term Implications - The actions taken by the U.S. have undermined trust in the security of private keys, with a reported 62% decline in confidence among global cryptocurrency users following the LuBian incident [9]. - The U.S. has set a dangerous precedent by asserting jurisdiction over digital assets based on their connection to U.S. dollar transactions, impacting the global digital asset landscape and increasing volatility in the cryptocurrency market [9]. Conclusion - The fate of the 127,271 Bitcoins serves as a warning about the potential misuse of technology and legal systems in the digital age, highlighting the need for transparency and effective oversight to protect digital assets from similar future occurrences [10].