笔谈丨以系统观念破解难题

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of grassroots supervision quality in relation to public perception of anti-corruption efforts, highlighting issues such as imprecise problem identification and inadequate rectification measures [1] - The need for a systematic approach in grassroots supervision is stressed, focusing on key links and enhancing coordination to shift from mere coverage to effective oversight [1] Group 2 - Establishing a mechanism for problem line disposal is crucial, which includes collective assessment, collaborative handling, and comprehensive management to ensure precise acceptance and tracking of issues [2] - The importance of scientific assessment and classification in handling problem lines is highlighted, with a focus on the role of county-level disciplinary committees in overseeing the process [2] Group 3 - The ultimate goal of supervision is to drive problem resolution and improve governance, necessitating a mechanism for rectification that includes clear plans, process supervision, and effectiveness evaluation [3] - The need for accountability in rectification efforts is emphasized, with measures in place to address slow progress or superficial compliance, ensuring that issues are resolved effectively [3]