从没见过如此无耻之人：美国如何将12.7万枚比特币窃取“合法化”

Core Insights - The article discusses the unprecedented hacking incident of the "LuBian" Bitcoin mining pool in December 2020, where 127,426 Bitcoins were stolen, and the subsequent seizure of 127,271 Bitcoins by the U.S. Department of Justice in 2025, raising questions about the legitimacy of the government's actions and the potential use of state-sponsored hacking [1][5]. Group 1: Technical Vulnerabilities - The LuBian mining pool utilized a flawed third-party key generation tool that employed a non-cryptographic pseudorandom number generator (MT19937), leading to significant vulnerabilities in private key generation [2][4]. - The report from the China National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center indicated that 224 out of 256 bits of the generated private keys were predictable, reducing the difficulty of cracking from 2^256 to approximately 2^32, making it feasible to crack within about one hour [4]. Group 2: Judicial Manipulation - The U.S. government strategically targeted the Cambodian Prince Group as a scapegoat, focusing on their alleged illegal activities while obscuring the original theft from the LuBian mining pool [5]. - The evidence presented by the U.S. Department of Justice was criticized for being weak and hastily compiled, including questionable references to unrelated incidents, suggesting a lack of thorough investigation [5]. Group 3: Strategic Objectives - The seizure of these Bitcoins is seen as a response to the U.S. federal debt exceeding $36 trillion and a fiscal deficit of 6.8% of GDP, with cryptocurrency assets becoming a new tool for the government to monetize [6][8]. - The operation is framed as a means to alleviate fiscal pressure, legitimize past state-sponsored hacking actions, and reinforce U.S. dominance in the global digital asset landscape [8][10]. Group 4: Systemic Risks - The actions taken by the U.S. government have led to a significant erosion of trust in the security of Bitcoin, with a reported 62% decline in user confidence regarding private key safety following the LuBian incident [12]. - The U.S. is establishing a dangerous precedent by unilaterally defining the jurisdiction over global digital assets, which could undermine the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies and instill fear among global investors [15][16].