关税闹剧反噬太狠了，特朗普心急如焚，美国可能要倒赔2万亿

Core Viewpoint - Trump's warning about potential consequences of his tariff policies suggests that a Supreme Court ruling against him could lead to liabilities as high as $2 trillion, which could significantly impact the U.S. economy [1][7]. Tariff Policy and Economic Impact - Trump's administration has implemented a "America First" tariff policy aimed at protecting U.S. businesses and workers, resulting in a significant increase in tariff revenue, which reached $174 billion by September, a rise of $116 billion year-over-year [4]. - However, this policy has faced backlash from other countries and U.S. businesses, leading to legal challenges that have reached the Supreme Court, where initial hearings have shown skepticism from judges, including conservative ones [5]. Potential Liabilities - The estimated $2 trillion liability includes approximately $500 billion from potential refunds of collected tariffs and the risk of losing nearly $2 trillion in foreign investments tied to tariff negotiations with countries like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Japan, and South Korea [6][7]. Domestic Economic Consequences - The tariff policy has led to increased costs for American consumers, as prices for imported goods have risen, effectively acting as a tax on households [13]. - U.S. farmers and businesses have also suffered due to retaliatory tariffs from countries like China, which have resulted in lost orders for American agricultural products [13]. Long-term Risks - The unilateral approach to tariffs could damage the U.S.'s international credibility, making other nations hesitant to engage in long-term trade agreements, potentially leading to a shift away from the dollar [14]. - Historical parallels are drawn to the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, which led to retaliatory measures and contributed to the Great Depression, suggesting that current policies may have similarly detrimental long-term effects [14]. Political Maneuvering - In response to the looming Supreme Court decision, Trump is employing strategies of intimidation and inducement, emphasizing the $2 trillion figure to pressure justices while also promising financial benefits to American citizens [11][15].