2 1 Shi Ji Jing Ji Bao Dao·2025-11-20 23:21Core Viewpoint - The concept of "bank direct supply housing" is misleading as banks do not sell houses directly; instead, they promote properties they have repossessed due to loan defaults, aiming to recover losses through asset disposal [1][2]. Group 1: Nature of "Bank Direct Supply Housing" - Banks are licensed financial institutions primarily engaged in lending and deposit services, not in real estate sales [1]. - The term "bank direct supply housing" refers to banks promoting properties they have acquired as collateral, not selling them directly [1][2]. - The traditional method for banks to dispose of these properties involves bulk sales to asset management companies or public auctions on platforms like Alibaba and JD [2]. Group 2: Market Context and Trends - The popularity of "bank direct supply housing" has surged this year due to low transaction rates for judicial auction properties, with an overall success rate of only 13.1% in the first three quarters [2]. - Banks are under pressure to accelerate inventory turnover, leading to an increase in the promotion of "bank direct supply housing" to individual buyers [2][3]. Group 3: Considerations for Buyers - The ownership of the properties remains with the original debtors, and banks only have the authority to dispose of them, meaning potential legal issues may still exist [4]. - Buyers should thoroughly investigate the properties for any existing legal disputes or encumbrances, as well as potential challenges in vacating the property post-purchase [4]. - The overall volume of "bank direct supply housing" is limited, with only a few dozen to a few hundred properties available, which is unlikely to impact the broader housing market significantly [4].