河南深化案件质量评查 提升依规依纪依法办案质效

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of enhancing case quality in the disciplinary inspection and supervision work in Henan Province, focusing on systematic evaluation and improvement mechanisms [1][3] - The Henan Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision has established a multi-level evaluation system to ensure comprehensive scrutiny of key aspects such as evidence, classification, procedures, documentation, and execution of penalties [1][3] - The evaluation process includes daily assessments and concentrated reviews of self-handled cases, accountability cases, and cases from dispatched agencies, promoting self-examination and correction [1][2] Group 2 - The Anyang Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision has developed a quality control mechanism that includes self-assessment, collaborative evaluation, and follow-up reviews to ensure thorough oversight of case handling [2] - The Hebi City He District Commission has implemented a "multi-level, full coverage" evaluation system, requiring case handlers to conduct self-assessments against four key criteria before case transfer [2] - The Nanyang Municipal Commission focuses on accountability case evaluations, ensuring thorough rectification of identified issues and promoting a culture of continuous improvement among disciplinary inspection personnel [3] Group 3 - The emphasis on "evaluation" and "correction" highlights the dual approach of identifying and rectifying issues, with a focus on establishing a dynamic accountability system for problem resolution [3] - The implementation of a dynamic rectification ledger and regular follow-up reviews ensures that issues are addressed promptly and effectively, preventing recurrence [3][4] - The establishment of a comprehensive case quality system includes guidelines for common issues, training sessions for staff, and targeted support to enhance operational standards [4]