既营造宽松环境，又堵住风险漏洞深圳以有力监督护航科技创新的实践路径

Core Viewpoint - The "Huangtao Shenzhen-Hong Kong Technology Innovation Cooperation Zone" is emerging as a significant international technology innovation center, leveraging its unique geographical and institutional advantages to foster collaboration between Shenzhen and Hong Kong [1][2]. Group 1: Development and Strategic Positioning - The Huangtao Cooperation Zone is identified as a key platform for major cooperation between Guangdong, Hong Kong, and Macau, with a strategic goal to become an "important point of the international technology innovation center in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area" and a "world-class research hub" [1]. - The establishment of the Huangtao Development Office in January 2024 aims to create a flexible environment for technological innovation while ensuring effective governance [3]. Group 2: Research and Funding Mechanisms - Shenzhen allocates a portion of its fiscal budget annually to support research and innovation in the Huangtao Cooperation Zone, focusing on life sciences, materials, and information industries [2]. - The Huangtao Development Office implements a system for project selection, team formation, and funding management, encouraging collaboration among universities, research institutions, and enterprises [2]. Group 3: Oversight and Governance - The Shenzhen Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection has integrated the Huangtao Development Office into its supervision framework, emphasizing the importance of monitoring major reform tasks and ensuring accountability [4]. - A new mechanism called "Five Meetings, One Evaluation, One Review, One Discussion" has been established to enhance political supervision and address issues in the implementation of reforms [5]. Group 4: Addressing Corruption and Ensuring Integrity - The Shenzhen Municipal Commission has intensified efforts to combat corruption in the allocation of special funds for research projects, focusing on the integrity of project evaluation processes [6]. - Measures have been taken to prevent conflicts of interest among evaluation experts, including the prohibition of private interactions with stakeholders during the evaluation process [7].