最高法：家务劳动具有经济价值 保障全职家庭主妇财产权益

Group 1 - The Supreme Court of China emphasizes that both physical and psychological violence are considered domestic violence, highlighting that actions such as humiliation and self-harm threats fall under psychological abuse [1][3] - A notable case involves the PUA incident where the perpetrator's continuous verbal abuse led to the victim's suicide, establishing a causal relationship between the abuse and the tragic outcome [2][3] - The court's ruling in this case recognized the victim's mental state deterioration due to prolonged psychological abuse, which was a decisive factor in the victim's suicide risk [2][3] Group 2 - Another case illustrates that self-harm threats can constitute psychological violence, as demonstrated by a husband threatening self-harm, which instilled fear in his wife, thus qualifying as domestic violence [4][5] - The Supreme Court's interpretation indicates that psychological control through threats, even without direct physical harm, is a form of violence that can severely impact the victim's mental health [5] - A case involving a full-time housewife who suffered domestic violence was resolved in her favor, recognizing her contributions to the household and awarding her compensation for her labor and damages [6][7]