【行业深度】洞察2025:中国个人冰雪装备行业竞争格局及排名情况(附市场集中度、竞争派系、战略集群等)
Qian Zhan Wang·2025-11-23 06:08

Core Insights - The article discusses the competitive landscape and market dynamics of the personal snow equipment industry in China, highlighting the entry of various companies and their strategic positioning [1][10]. Industry Overview - The personal snow equipment market in China has seen early entrants like Tanshan and Sanfu Outdoor, established in 1999 and 2001 respectively, with registered capital of 880 million and 150 million yuan [1]. - Decathlon entered the market in 2003 with a registered capital of 1 billion yuan, expanding from apparel to outdoor sports [1][2]. - The market began to grow in 2004 with the rise of skiing as a leisure activity, leading to the entry of companies like Tanboer and Cold Mountain Snow Equipment [1]. Competitive Landscape - The industry can be categorized into four competitive factions: 1. Companies specializing in snow equipment (e.g., Songyoupai, Tanboer) 2. High-end foreign brands (e.g., Burton, Decathlon) 3. Outdoor product companies with snow equipment as a segment (e.g., Tanshan, Anta) 4. Companies involved in snow-related tourism and training [3][5]. Strategic Clusters - The market leaders are international brands with over 40 years of experience, focusing on high-end snow equipment [7]. - Market challengers primarily sell through e-commerce platforms, targeting mid-range consumers during the snow season, with revenues in the million yuan range [7]. - Market followers have low specialization and revenue, often involved in snow tourism and training [8]. Market Concentration - The overall market concentration in the personal snow equipment industry is low, with a fragmented structure and limited market share for leading brands [10]. - International brands focus on high-end segments, while domestic brands are mostly small to medium-sized, relying on cost advantages but facing challenges in technology and brand development [10]. Competitive Dynamics - The competitive environment is complex, with low bargaining power for suppliers and strong bargaining power for consumers due to high product homogeneity [12]. - The threat of new entrants is significant, particularly in the low-end market where barriers to entry are low [12]. - Existing companies engage in intense competition, primarily through price wars in the low-end market, while high-end brands compete on technology and brand differentiation [12].