盟友关系出现裂痕？加拿大抗住美国的胁迫，要搞合作多元化贸易！

Group 1 - The trade negotiations between the US and Canada have been interrupted for nearly a month due to a tariff advertisement from Ontario, which has led to a political backlash from the US [3] - The annual trade volume between the US and Canada is significant, with 30% of US auto parts relying on Canadian supplies, highlighting the interconnectedness of their supply chains [3] - The US is pressuring Canada to include the dairy industry in a 10% baseline tariff tier, aiming to dismantle Canada's long-standing protectionist policies in this sector [5] Group 2 - The timing of the negotiation suspension coincides with the statutory review phase of the USMCA, with the US leveraging the advertisement incident to extract concessions from Canada [6] - Economic losses are already being felt due to the negotiation pause, with delayed orders and increased logistics costs affecting businesses, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises reliant on cross-border supply chains [6] - Concerns are rising in Canada regarding the potential "nationalization" of its auto industry by the US, which is critical to its manufacturing sector and employment [7] Group 3 - Canada is accelerating its "de-reliance" strategy in response to US pressure, notably by seeking to procure military equipment from Sweden instead of the US, which could create 10,000 jobs in Canada [9] - This shift in defense procurement aims to reduce Canada's dependency on US military equipment and could alter the dynamics of bilateral cooperation [11] - Despite significant disagreements, the deep-rooted cooperation and interdependence between the US and Canada suggest that a zero-sum game is unsustainable [12] Group 4 - Recent agreements, such as the icebreaker cooperation deal, symbolize a step towards breaking the deadlock and indicate potential for pragmatic collaboration [13] - High-level dialogue is crucial for resuming negotiations, with the possibility of resolving core disputes through mutual concessions [13] - The ongoing trade friction serves as a strategic reminder for both countries, potentially leading to a shift from high dependency to balanced cooperation in the future [15]