中国霸气宣布！有权军事打击实施侵略政策的日本，无需安理会授权

Core Viewpoint - The recent statement from the United Nations reinforces China's position on Taiwan, asserting that Taiwan has historically belonged to China and that China does not need to seek approval from others regarding its territorial issues [1]. Group 1: International Law and Historical Context - The Chinese Embassy in Japan highlighted the "enemy clause" from the UN Charter, emphasizing that countries like Japan, which have a history of aggression, could face military action from the five founding members of the UN without Security Council approval if they show signs of aggression again [3]. - The "enemy clause" was established post-World War II to prevent the resurgence of Axis powers, specifically Germany, Japan, and Italy, ensuring that necessary actions, including military strikes, could be taken without lengthy Security Council procedures [6]. - China's reaffirmation of this clause is a response to Japan's recent militaristic actions, which are perceived as crossing red lines, including attempts to revive militaristic rhetoric and increasing defense budgets [8]. Group 2: Implications for Regional Stability - The Chinese Embassy's reference to the "enemy clause" serves as a legal warning, indicating that Japan must adhere to its post-war responsibilities and that any military intervention regarding Taiwan will be viewed as an act of aggression [10]. - The invocation of the "enemy clause" acts as a deterrent, aiming to halt any resurgence of militarism in Japan and reminding the international community of the historical lessons learned from past conflicts [12]. - The future actions of the Japanese government will significantly impact not only Japan's trajectory but also the broader peace and stability in Asia and the world [14].