Core Viewpoint - The report from Zhongtai Securities highlights the intensifying low-price competition in industries such as photovoltaics, batteries, and automobiles since 2024, prompting policy attention towards "anti-involution" measures aimed at optimizing supply-side structures and enhancing national competitiveness [1][2]. Group 1: Policy Development - The "anti-involution" policy has evolved from departmental advocacy to institutionalization, with significant milestones including its introduction in the 2024 Politburo meeting and its incorporation into the 2025 government work report and the "14th Five-Year Plan" [2]. - The current governance approach is characterized by top-level institutionalization, market-driven clearing, and comprehensive expectation management [2]. Group 2: Background of the Current "Anti-Involution" - The current "anti-involution" policy is initiated in a macroeconomic context where growth has slowed to 5% or lower, contrasting with the previous supply-side reforms that occurred during a period of over 6% growth [3]. - The industrial structure has shifted, with China now holding leading capacities in sectors like photovoltaics and new energy vehicles, yet facing overcapacity due to slowed demand and intensified competition [3]. Group 3: Strategic Logic of "Anti-Involution" - The core of current high-level policies is to address international competition and enhance national competitiveness, positioning "anti-involution" as a critical tool for optimizing supply-side structures [4]. - The ultimate goal is to establish industries with global pricing power, technological barriers, and resource control, transforming them into strategic assets in international negotiations [4]. Group 4: Lessons from the Rare Earth Experience - Prior to 2010, the rare earth industry faced chaotic competition and low prices, leading to resource wastage and a low global value chain position [5]. - The establishment of large rare earth enterprise groups in 2014 and the completion of industry consolidation by 2016 significantly improved the situation, positioning China as a key player in the global high-tech supply chain [5]. Group 5: Focus Areas for "Anti-Involution" - The current "anti-involution" policy is likely to concentrate on sectors with "rare earth-like" characteristics, which include global capacity and technological leadership, the presence of chaotic expansion and low-price competition, and potential for long-term growth driven by external demand [6]. - The new energy sector is positioned as a strategic tool in international relations, with China maintaining technological leadership and significant global production capacity in areas like photovoltaics and battery storage [6]. Group 6: Investment Recommendations - Investment focus should be on upstream new energy sectors, particularly companies with raw material barriers and cost advantages in lithium, silicon materials, and electrolyte production [7]. - Opportunities in power equipment and energy storage are highlighted due to structural growth driven by AI-related electricity demand, with recommendations for companies targeting overseas markets [7]. - Emphasis on resource security and small metal materials as strategic pillars, recommending companies with high resource concentration and barriers, including leaders in rare earths, copper, cobalt, and lithium [7].
中泰证券:本轮“反内卷”政策或更加聚焦于具备全球“类稀土”特征的重点领域