四个月前挥舞关税大棒，11月20日特朗普急撤40%巴西关税

Group 1 - The core point of the article is that Trump's decision to cancel tariffs on Brazilian goods, including beef and coffee, represents a strategic retreat rather than a loss, driven by political and economic pressures [3][7][15] - The initial justification for the tariffs, which was to punish Brazil's government, collapsed after a Brazilian court sentenced former President Bolsonaro to 27 years in prison, undermining the rationale for U.S. intervention [9][19] - The U.S. food processing industry faced significant cost increases due to the tariffs, with beef prices rising nearly 15% and coffee prices up 12% year-over-year, leading to discontent among Trump's voter base [21][23] Group 2 - The article highlights three main pressures that forced the U.S. to compromise: the collapse of political justification, backlash from domestic industries, and the need to maintain strategic influence in Latin America [17][21][25] - Brazil's response to U.S. tariffs included asserting judicial independence and implementing digital service taxes on U.S. tech companies, showcasing a strategic counteraction [31][33] - The article suggests a shift in global power dynamics towards a "chip replacement" model, where countries engage in strategic negotiations rather than outright confrontations, emphasizing the importance of understanding domestic pressures [39][42][45]