特朗普政府酝酿关税B计划

Group 1 - The article discusses President Trump's ongoing efforts to maintain his tariff policies, particularly the "reciprocal tariffs" and the legal challenges surrounding them [1][2] - The White House has recently adjusted the scope of the "reciprocal tariffs," excluding various agricultural products from the additional tariff list, effective from November 13 [1] - Trump has proposed the possibility of issuing $2,000 checks to many Americans as a form of tariff "dividend," contingent upon Congressional approval [1] Group 2 - The Trump administration imposed tariffs on products from Canada, Mexico, and China under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), leading to legal challenges from affected U.S. businesses and states [2] - A previous court ruling stated that Trump lacked the authority to impose tariffs on multiple countries under IEEPA, prompting an appeal to the Supreme Court [2] - The outcome of the Supreme Court's decision is expected to have significant implications for international trade and U.S. fiscal policy, potentially requiring the government to refund over $88 billion in tariffs if the ruling is unfavorable [2] Group 3 - The article outlines alternative legal frameworks, such as Sections 301 and 122 of the Trade Act, which could allow the administration to impose tariffs if the current policies are overturned [3][4] - Section 301 permits investigations into unfair trade practices and suggests unilateral sanctions, while Section 122 allows for tariffs up to 15% for a maximum of 150 days [4] - Despite these alternatives, they may face legal challenges and have limitations in terms of implementation speed and scope [4] Group 4 - The National Economic Council Director indicated that if the Supreme Court rules against the Trump administration, the government may resort to using Sections 301 or 122 to reimpose tariffs [5] - The administration is also utilizing Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to impose tariffs on metals and automobiles, which has drawn criticism from U.S. trade partners [5] - There are concerns that if IEEPA tariffs are deemed unconstitutional, Section 232 may become the fallback plan for the administration, affecting a significant portion of the manufacturing sector [5]