亲历金龙鱼子公司案“庭审马拉松”，见证超18亿元退赔责任背后的复杂攻防

Core Viewpoint - The case involving Jinlongyu's subsidiary has drawn significant market attention due to its association with a fraud case resulting in substantial financial losses, with the subsidiary being held partially responsible for a compensation of 1.881 billion yuan [2][3][4]. Group 1: Case Background - Jinlongyu's subsidiary, Guangzhou Yihai, is embroiled in a complex criminal lawsuit involving three parties: Guangzhou Yihai, Yunnan Huijia, and Anhui Huawen, with the case tracing back to 2008 and involving palm oil trade [3][4]. - The fraud scheme involved Yunnan Huijia's head bribing Anhui Huawen's executives to alter the transaction model from "payment before delivery" to "delivery before payment," leading to significant financial discrepancies [4][5]. Group 2: Court Proceedings - The first trial took place from February 27 to March 1, 2024, focusing on the prosecution's evidence and the defendants' responses, while the second trial on July 3 and 4, 2024, centered around the audit report and expert testimonies [5][6][9]. - The audit report became a contentious point, with disputes over its compliance and the qualifications of the auditors, which were critical in determining Guangzhou Yihai's involvement in the alleged fraud [6][7][9]. Group 3: Legal Outcomes - The first-instance judgment found Guangzhou Yihai guilty as an accomplice in contract fraud, ordering it to share the compensation responsibility of 1.881 billion yuan with Yunnan Huijia, leading to an appeal by Guangzhou Yihai [2][11][12]. - The company maintains that it was unaware of any fraudulent activities and argues that the losses were a result of collusion between Anhui Huawen and Yunnan Huijia, asserting its innocence in the matter [12][13]. Group 4: Future Implications - The upcoming second trial is expected to focus on four main issues: subjective intent, the nature of the actions taken by employees, causation of losses, and the classification of the case as a civil dispute or criminal fraud [13].