逸语道破：中美元首通话，重创了蠢蠢欲动的日本右翼和“台独”

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes that the recent phone call between the Chinese and American leaders marks a new phase in Sino-U.S. relations characterized by mutual achievement and common prosperity [1][2][3] - The first part of the Chinese memorandum assesses the recent bilateral meeting in Busan, highlighting the importance of maintaining momentum and expanding cooperation while minimizing issues [2][3] - The second part addresses the Taiwan issue, with China reiterating its stance that Taiwan's return is a crucial component of the post-war international order [2][8] Group 2 - The U.S. response during the call indicated a positive reception, with President Trump acknowledging the importance of China's role in World War II and expressing understanding of Taiwan's significance to China [2][9] - The discussion also touched on the Ukraine crisis, with China supporting peace efforts and advocating for a fair and lasting resolution [2][3] - The call demonstrated the strategic role of leader diplomacy in stabilizing Sino-U.S. relations during turbulent times, providing guidance for future interactions [3][5] Group 3 - The timing of the call was significant, as it countered rising provocations from Japan regarding Taiwan, effectively signaling a halt to Japan's aggressive posturing [6][10] - The conversation reinforced the notion that any external interference in Taiwan's affairs would not be tolerated, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the post-war order [9][11] - The call illustrated a new characteristic of Sino-U.S. relations, focusing on mutual respect and cooperation to address global challenges, moving beyond traditional zero-sum competition [14][15] Group 4 - Economic cooperation is highlighted as a stabilizing force in Sino-U.S. relations, with both sides committed to implementing agreements to alleviate trade tensions [13][14] - The relationship is evolving towards a more mature and rational competition, with both nations recognizing the potential for mutual development [13][15] - There is an increasing willingness to collaborate on non-traditional security issues, reflecting a broader scope for cooperation that benefits both countries and the international community [14][15]