马斯克开始用Grok替代员工了！最惨部门裁员90%

Core Viewpoint - Elon Musk is replacing employees at X (formerly Twitter) with AI technology, specifically using Grok to take over roles previously held by human staff [1][2]. Group 1: Workforce Reduction - Musk has laid off half of the engineering team responsible for trust and safety issues at X, reducing the team from over 100 members to fewer than 10 [2]. - The layoffs are part of a broader strategy to automate processes and reduce human labor in favor of AI solutions [3][8]. - The xAI team, which is responsible for Grok, also experienced significant layoffs, with over 500 employees (about one-third of the data annotation team) being let go in September [18]. Group 2: AI Integration - Musk aims to fully automate X's algorithms, allowing users to interact with Grok to customize their content feeds [8][12]. - The introduction of Grok as a central figure in X's operations signifies a shift towards AI-driven management, with Grok expected to take on a more significant role in content moderation and user engagement [8][9]. - Musk's Macrohard initiative aims to use AI to automate software development, potentially replicating Microsoft's past achievements [9][12]. Group 3: Leadership and Team Dynamics - The new leadership at xAI consists of twin engineers Dima and Ievgin Soboliev, who have extensive backgrounds in AI and machine learning [3][6]. - The Soboliev brothers are implementing a rigorous work culture at X, emphasizing long hours and efficiency, which may lead to further staff reductions [8]. - There is a growing concern about the disconnect between the safety team and the AI systems, as the safety team lacks control over the content generated by Grok, leading to potential accountability issues [12][13]. Group 4: Future Implications - The aggressive AI strategy may undermine the platform's safety and core business operations, particularly in light of the ongoing challenges with the X Money payment service [14][16]. - The frequent turnover in the X Money team raises concerns about the stability needed to gain regulatory approval for new financial services [15][16].