鲍威尔坦言12月降息难定,手下官员立场持续割裂
Jin Shi Shu Ju·2025-11-25 08:30

Core Viewpoint - The Federal Reserve's 2025 voting committee shows a split in opinions regarding interest rate cuts, with 5 members favoring gradual reductions and 6 advocating for caution due to concerns about inflation control. Group 1: Support for Rate Cuts (5 Votes) - New York Fed President Williams indicates that the Fed may consider a rate cut "soon" without jeopardizing inflation targets [2] - Fed Governor Waller believes a December rate cut is appropriate, but January's actions are more uncertain [2] - Fed Governor Milan expresses support for a small rate cut in December if his vote is decisive, having previously advocated for a 50 basis point cut in the last two meetings [2] - Fed Governors Bowman and Cook did not express a stance in November but lean towards a rate cut [2] Group 2: Caution Against Rate Cuts (6 Votes) - Fed Vice Chair Jefferson emphasizes the need for caution as rates approach neutral levels [3] - St. Louis Fed President Musalem notes limited room for easing and the need for careful action [3] - Kansas City Fed President Schmidt warns that further rate cuts could have lasting impacts on inflation, opposing cuts in the October meeting [3] - Boston Fed President Collins is skeptical about a December rate cut, asserting that current monetary policy is appropriate [3] - Chicago Fed President Goolsbee cautions against premature rate cuts, suggesting that while rates may decline, the current period must be navigated carefully [3] Group 3: Non-2025 Voting Members - San Francisco Fed President Daly supports a December rate cut, citing deteriorating labor market conditions [5] - Dallas Fed President Logan finds it difficult to support another December cut unless circumstances change [6] - Philadelphia Fed President Paulson advocates for a cautious approach to the December rate decision, stating that previous cuts have set higher thresholds for future reductions [6] - Cleveland Fed President Hamak emphasizes that rate cuts to support the labor market could lead to persistent inflation and encourages maintaining restrictive rates to curb inflation [6]