中美关税大战最大成果：并非中国赢了, 而是美国再无手段控制中国

Core Points - The article discusses the escalating trade tensions between the US and China, particularly focusing on tariffs and countermeasures related to the fentanyl crisis and rare earth elements [1][11][20]. Tariff Actions - On February 1, the US imposed a 10% tariff on Chinese goods, citing a national emergency due to fentanyl smuggling, which later increased to 20% on March 3 and reached a total of 54% by April 2 [1][11]. - By October 10, President Trump threatened to raise tariffs to nearly 245% in response to China's rare earth export controls [1][7]. China's Countermeasures - China responded with its own tariffs, including a 15% tariff on US coal and various agricultural products, and implemented export controls on seven rare earth elements [3][11]. - By June 9, China established stricter regulations on rare earth exports, which included a traceability system and increased technical standards [3][9]. Rare Earth Elements - China dominates the rare earth processing market, accounting for over 90% of global production, making it crucial for US military and technology sectors [4][9]. - The US military's reliance on Chinese rare earths highlights the strategic importance of these materials in defense applications [9][20]. Supply Chain Dynamics - The US is attempting to restructure its supply chains by encouraging companies to relocate production to countries like Mexico and Vietnam [5][11]. - Despite US efforts, China's industrial strength remains resilient, with significant growth in exports of solar and electric vehicle technologies [4][18]. Global Trade Relations - China's trade with other countries has been increasing, with a notable 30.3% rise in trade with Italy, indicating a diversification of trade relationships [13][18]. - The article suggests that the trade war has not significantly hindered China's economic integration with other markets, as evidenced by increased foreign direct investment and mergers [16][18]. Strategic Implications - The ongoing trade conflict reflects a broader struggle for influence and control over emerging technologies and standards, with both nations vying for dominance in global supply chains [22][26]. - China's approach to trade and investment is characterized by a focus on cooperation and mutual benefit, contrasting with the US's more protectionist stance [18][26].