福建实达集团股份有限公司关于全资孙公司涉及重大诉讼进展的公告

Core Viewpoint - Fujian Shida Group Co., Ltd. has reached a mediation agreement regarding a significant lawsuit involving its wholly-owned subsidiary, which is expected to have no negative impact on the company's profits if the agreement is successfully executed [2][4][6]. Group 1: Lawsuit Overview - The lawsuit involves Shida Group's wholly-owned subsidiary, Kizilsu Zhongke Rongtong Information System Integration Service Co., Ltd., which was sued by China Telecom Kizilsu Branch for a contract dispute, demanding payment of RMB 41,253,846.23 [3][4]. - The court has issued a mediation agreement where Kizilsu Zhongke is required to pay the claimed amount to China Telecom Kizilsu Branch [4][5]. Group 2: Mediation Agreement Details - The mediation agreement stipulates that the project owner will pay the total amount of RMB 41,253,846.23 to the plaintiff as per the contract terms [5][6]. - The agreement allows the plaintiff to directly confirm the amount with the project owner and request payment, with the defendant required to issue corresponding invoices [5][6]. Group 3: Impact on Financials - If the mediation agreement is fulfilled, it is stated that there will be no adverse effects on the company's current or future profits, pending the results of the accounting firm's audit [2][6]. - The company will closely monitor the progress of the lawsuit and take necessary measures to protect its and shareholders' interests [6]. Group 4: Stock Trading Anomalies - The company's stock experienced a significant price fluctuation, with a cumulative increase of over 20% in two consecutive trading days [9][10]. - The company has confirmed that there are no undisclosed significant matters affecting its stock price, aside from previously disclosed acquisition activities [11][12]. Group 5: Financial Performance - As of the third quarter of 2025, the company reported a revenue of RMB 134.59 million and a net loss of RMB 87.57 million, indicating ongoing financial challenges [9][12]. - The company's current price-to-earnings ratio is significantly higher than the industry average, suggesting potential overvaluation [12].