违纪受处分后又被发现此前的违纪行为如何处理

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the disciplinary actions against a Communist Party member, Li, who failed to disclose previous violations during an investigation, highlighting the need for strict enforcement of party discipline and the implications of "漏错" (omission error) in disciplinary proceedings [1][4][7]. Group 1: Disciplinary Actions - Li was initially given a serious warning for violating integrity rules, which had a one and a half year impact period [1]. - After the warning, additional undisclosed violations were discovered, necessitating further disciplinary action [2][7]. - There are differing opinions on whether to revoke the initial warning or treat the new violations separately, with the latter being favored in the analysis [2][6]. Group 2: "漏错" (Omission Error) Implications - The article defines "漏错" as a situation where a party member, after receiving a disciplinary action, is found to have undisclosed violations that occurred before the initial action [4][5]. - The criteria for determining "漏错" include that the previous disciplinary action was not expulsion and that the omitted violations were discovered after the initial action took effect [5][6]. - The impact period for disciplinary actions in "漏错" cases should be combined, meaning the new disciplinary impact period is added to the remaining period of the original action [7][8].