苹果、Epic双双要求美法庭重新考虑反垄断裁决

Core Viewpoint - Apple and Epic Games are requesting the court to reconsider its antitrust ruling, which allows developers to place links in their apps but does not oppose Apple's 30% commission on App Store sales [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Both Apple and Epic submitted independent court documents challenging the ruling made by a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals [1]. - The companies are seeking either a rehearing by the three-judge panel or a hearing by all 11 judges of the appeals court [1][2]. - The original lawsuit dates back to 2021 when a federal district court in California ruled that Apple's 30% commission on developers' sales was illegal [1]. Group 2: Arguments from Apple and Epic - Apple argues that its commission structure promotes fair market competition and does not violate any antitrust laws, opposing a nationwide injunction against this policy [1]. - Epic contends that Apple's commission policy directly impacts the core mission of federal antitrust laws to promote market competition, claiming the appeals court did not adequately balance the effects of the commission on consumers and competition [2]. Group 3: Current Status of the Case - The district court's ruling is currently on hold and not enforced as the case is in the appeals process [5]. - The presiding judge, Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, indicated that Apple cannot prevent third-party developers from providing alternative payment links to consumers [5]. - However, Rogers did not provide detailed guidance on how the App Store should accommodate external payment links or buttons [6]. Group 4: Global Context - Apple's enforcement of its in-app payment system has sparked controversy globally, with antitrust regulators in countries like South Korea, the Netherlands, and Japan demanding that Apple open up payment channels for third-party applications [6].