27国通告美国，联手断中方后路，话音刚落，特朗普先向中国献礼

Core Viewpoint - The EU is attempting to leverage its relationship with the US to negotiate tariff reductions, particularly concerning steel and aluminum, while simultaneously trying to use China as a bargaining chip. However, the US is not receptive to this strategy and is instead focusing on EU digital regulations as a key negotiation point [1][3][5]. Group 1: EU's Strategy and Challenges - The EU is under pressure due to the potential expansion of US steel and aluminum tariffs, which could affect over 400 products with a 50% tariff rate, threatening the viability of European steel companies [3][5]. - In an effort to negotiate tariff relief, the EU is promoting a narrative of a "common enemy" in China, suggesting that if the US eases tariffs, the EU will support US efforts against China [3][5]. - The EU's reliance on China for critical resources, such as rare earth elements and components for electric vehicles, has created a sense of urgency to negotiate with the US while also managing its relationship with China [5][16]. Group 2: US's Position and Digital Regulations - US Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo has shifted the focus of negotiations to the EU's digital regulations, suggesting that if the EU can find a balanced regulatory framework, it could attract $1 trillion in investment, which is more appealing to the US than the EU's anti-China stance [7][9]. - The US is not interested in a united front against China but rather in easing regulations that affect American tech giants, indicating a prioritization of economic interests over geopolitical alliances [9][18]. - The EU's digital regulatory framework is seen as a point of contention, as it represents a significant area of legislative power for the EU, which the US is attempting to leverage in negotiations [9][20]. Group 3: Implications for EU-China Relations - The EU's attempt to align with the US against China has backfired, as the US has simultaneously offered concessions to China, such as reducing tariffs on fentanyl-related products and suspending export controls on rare earths [11][14]. - This dual approach by the US highlights a disparity in how the EU and US view their relationships with China, with the US prioritizing its own economic needs over its alliance with the EU [14][22]. - The EU's strategy of using China as a bargaining chip has left it in a precarious position, as it risks alienating a key trading partner while failing to secure the desired concessions from the US [16][20].