为了让美国放过自己，欧盟提议联合抗中，遭美方拒绝：联合可以，税坚决不能减

Core Viewpoint - The recent US-EU trade negotiations highlight the complexities and strategic maneuvering in international trade, particularly in the context of US-China relations, with the EU attempting to leverage cooperation against China to negotiate tariff reductions on steel products, but facing firm resistance from the US [1][4]. Group 1: Trade Negotiations - The EU's trade commissioner proposed a joint approach to counter China in exchange for the US lifting high tariffs on 50% of EU steel products, but the US firmly rejected this offer [1]. - The US has expanded its list of steel products subject to high tariffs, citing the need to curb Chinese steel transshipment, despite the fact that only 3.2% of EU steel exports to the US are involved in such trade [4]. - The US's steel imports from Mexico surged by 27% during the same period, indicating a potential circumvention of tariffs through third countries [4]. Group 2: EU's Position and Strategy - The EU's attempt to use the "China card" to gain concessions from the US is seen as a significant miscalculation, as the US instead pushed for the EU to relax its digital tax regulations [4][6]. - The EU's low-profile approach in negotiations, hoping to gain favor with the US, has resulted in a lack of tangible benefits, raising questions about its diplomatic strategy [6][8]. - French President Macron's call for Europe to take on more responsibility, such as military support for Ukraine, was met with a lackluster response from the US, highlighting the EU's diminished influence in international affairs [6]. Group 3: Future Considerations - The EU needs to reassess its foreign policy, particularly towards the US, to protect its fundamental interests and establish a firmer stance in international trade [9]. - Strengthening cooperation with other countries is essential for the EU to enhance its bargaining power on the global stage [9]. - A clear strategic vision and unwavering execution will be crucial for the EU to regain its standing in international relations [9].