小米汽车首例定金案败诉，“未交车催收尾款”被判双倍返还定金

Core Viewpoint - The Haikou City Meilan District People's Court ruled on the first case in China regarding Xiaomi Auto's "unpaid vehicle collection" dispute, declaring the clause in the purchase agreement that required payment of the remaining balance within seven days without vehicle inspection as invalid, and ordered Xiaomi Jingming Technology Co., Ltd. to refund the consumer's deposit of 10,000 yuan in double [1] Group 1: Legal Implications - The court's decision provides significant judicial reference for consumer rights protection, emphasizing that innovative sales models in the new energy vehicle industry must adhere to fair trading principles [1] - The ruling highlights the necessity for companies to convert promotional commitments into actual performance, ensuring consumer rights are adequately protected in the design of standard clauses and transaction processes [1] Group 2: Industry Impact - The case sets a precedent for the "order before production" model in the new energy vehicle sector, indicating that companies must not violate the baseline of fair trading despite innovative sales approaches [1]