Group 1 - A hidden internal conflict has erupted within Trump's camp, dividing between grassroots populists led by Steve Bannon, who view AI as a threat to humanity, and capital accelerationists from Silicon Valley, who are pushing to eliminate regulatory barriers with significant funding [1] - Bannon warns that if AI is not controlled, it will lead to a fundamental and radical transformation of humanity, describing it as a loss of human subjectivity [8][10] - The accelerationists, represented by figures like Marc Andreessen, argue that any slowdown in AI development is morally wrong, claiming it could lead to unnecessary loss of life [14][16] Group 2 - A Super PAC named "Leading the Future," funded by Silicon Valley elites, aims to politically eliminate any politicians attempting to regulate AI, sending a clear message that there is no middle ground on AI issues [18] - Alex Bores, a young Democratic politician, becomes a target for the PAC after proposing a mild AI regulation bill, highlighting the aggressive tactics used by accelerationists against even moderate regulatory efforts [21][22] - In Texas, Senator Angela Paxton represents a moral defense against AI, advocating for legislation to protect children from potential harms of AI technologies, which poses a significant challenge to accelerationist agendas [29][34] Group 3 - Senator Josh Hawley initiates a philosophical counterattack against AI, arguing that the rise of AI threatens the dignity of ordinary people and could lead to a loss of jobs and human values [39][40] - Trump's campaign strategy involves balancing the interests of both the grassroots populists and Silicon Valley, as he seeks funding from tech elites while promising to protect jobs for his voter base [45][52] - The current MAGA movement reflects a complex alliance, with traditional conservatives fearing a centralized federal approach to AI regulation, which they see as a betrayal of state rights [56][60]
AI让MAGA陷入严重分裂，考验特朗普“制衡术”
3 6 Ke·2025-11-28 11:34