大豆危机再起!美国再度施压中国,中方早已做好应对

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the current dynamics in the soybean market, highlighting the disparity in prices between U.S. and South American soybeans, and the implications of tariffs and trade negotiations on these prices [1][3][19]. Price Disparity - The current post-tax price of U.S. soybeans is approximately 4600 RMB per ton, while South American soybeans are priced at 4000 RMB per ton, resulting in a price difference of 600 RMB per ton [3][5]. - The U.S. soybean price is further impacted by a 13% import tariff compared to a 3% tariff on South American soybeans, creating a significant cost disadvantage for U.S. products [5][7]. Import Volume and Market Impact - Recently, China purchased 160,000 tons of U.S. soybeans, which is a small fraction (less than 1.5%) of its annual import requirement of 110 million tons [7][12]. - The purchase was made by COFCO Group, and despite the small volume, it reflects China's strategic approach to trade negotiations with the U.S. [7][9]. Trade Negotiations and Market Reactions - The soybean purchase is seen as a response to U.S.-China trade talks, indicating a willingness to engage while maintaining control over the volume and timing of purchases [9][10]. - Following the announcement of the purchase, U.S. soybean futures prices fluctuated, demonstrating the sensitivity of the market to Chinese buying activity [10][12]. Future Price Trends - The article suggests that U.S. soybean production may decline due to uncertainty among farmers, while Brazil is expected to increase production, potentially stabilizing overall soybean prices [16][17]. - China's ability to source soybeans from both the U.S. and Brazil allows it to leverage pricing and maintain supply chain security [19][21]. Strategic Implications - The purchase of U.S. soybeans is framed not just as a commodity transaction but as a strategic move to enhance China's bargaining power in trade negotiations [19][21]. - The article emphasizes the importance of mutual benefits in trade, suggesting that further cooperation will depend on the U.S. addressing tariffs and technology restrictions [21].