欧洲议会打响主权保卫战：俄乌和谈，欧洲不能再当旁观者！

Core Viewpoint - The European Parliament's recent resolution emphasizes the necessity for Europe to have a significant role in negotiations regarding the Russia-Ukraine conflict, highlighting the impact of the conflict's outcome on European security [1][3]. Group 1: European Role in Negotiations - The resolution asserts that Europe must be included in all levels of negotiations, reflecting a push for strategic autonomy and a response to being marginalized in the mediation process [3][5]. - It calls for a ceasefire agreement that includes verifiable military disengagement clauses, indicating a structured approach to peace [3]. - The establishment of a multilateral security mechanism covering Ukraine and EU member states is proposed, showcasing Europe's concern over post-war order [3][9]. Group 2: Criticism of U.S. Policy - The resolution notably criticizes U.S. policies, suggesting that unilateral actions by the U.S. complicate the situation and may undermine the potential for lasting peace [1][3]. - Critics argue that Europe's military and economic dependence on the U.S. raises questions about its ability to mediate effectively, pointing to internal divisions within the EU regarding sanctions and military aid to Ukraine [5][9]. - Supporters counter that the differences in U.S. and European policies necessitate a balancing role for Europe, as it has become the largest economic aid provider to Ukraine, contributing over 60% of humanitarian assistance [5][9]. Group 3: Public Sentiment and Strategic Autonomy - A significant portion of the European public, 72%, supports a greater role for Europe in the peace process, yet 64% doubt the EU's ability to act independently from U.S. influence, reflecting a complex sentiment towards strategic autonomy [7][9]. - The ongoing war has led to rising energy prices, inflation, and security concerns in Europe, prompting a realization of the risks associated with relying solely on transatlantic alliances [7]. - The debate around the resolution indicates a growing consensus among Europeans about the need for a self-reliant security strategy, transcending traditional political divides [7][9]. Group 4: Future Implications - The resolution, while not legally binding, signals a shift in EU foreign policy direction, aiming to establish an independent crisis mediation mechanism and enhance defense capabilities [9]. - It suggests a potential transformation in long-term relations with Russia, which could alter the global power dynamics [9]. - For the EU to effectively participate in negotiations, it must address internal divisions and demonstrate its capability as a mature political player, beyond its economic strength [9].