以政策协同，驱动广东新型储能高质量发展丨能源之声

Core Viewpoint - Guangdong's new energy storage industry is experiencing rapid manufacturing expansion but faces challenges in local installation and consumption, leading to a "high capacity, low utilization" phenomenon. The province has established a leading "1+N+N" policy system for new energy storage, shifting focus from industry cultivation to electricity market mechanism construction to promote deep integration of storage and power systems [2][3]. Group 1: Policy Evolution and Key Analysis - Guangdong has positioned the new energy storage industry as a new economic growth driver, with the "Guiding Opinions" issued in 2023 marking a transition from catalytic support to market-oriented institutional arrangements [3][4]. - The development of energy storage policies in Guangdong has gone through three stages: early cultivation (2022 to early 2023), scale expansion (2023), and quality enhancement (post-2024) [4][5]. - The second stage aims to establish energy storage as a strategic pillar industry, leading to a complete "1+N+N" policy system, while the third stage focuses on integrating storage with the power system through performance-based subsidies and market participation rules [4][5]. Group 2: Industry Logic Upgrade - Guangdong has developed battery industry clusters in cities like Guangzhou and Shenzhen, but the market application scenarios for energy storage products remain underdeveloped, leading to a disconnect between supply and demand [5][6]. - To address this, the provincial government has launched initiatives to promote diverse application scenarios for energy storage, including low-carbon industrial parks and data centers, aiming to expand demand-side opportunities [6][7]. - The transition from a single manufacturing focus to a closed-loop model of manufacturing, application, and operation is crucial for sustainable development [6][7]. Group 3: Policy and Market Coordination - The rapid expansion of energy storage capacity has led to a misalignment between industry policies that push for growth and electricity policies that focus on operational efficiency and market returns [11][12]. - The current policy framework emphasizes hardware metrics like capacity and investment, while electricity policies prioritize operational contributions, creating a disconnect in objectives and evaluation [17][18]. - This misalignment has resulted in a structural dilemma where production capacity exceeds market demand, leading to underutilized projects and reduced investment confidence [15][18]. Group 4: Recommendations - To resolve the "high investment, low consumption" dilemma, a more systematic and coordinated policy framework is needed, combining push and pull mechanisms to foster high-quality development in the energy storage sector [19][20]. - Establishing a planning and evaluation system based on the actual value of energy storage in the power system is essential, guiding the layout of storage projects according to regional demand [20][21]. - Enhancing the synergy between storage policies and market dynamics, while promoting innovative business models, will broaden revenue sources and improve overall operational efficiency [21][22].