媒体是怎样报道“吸毒记录封存”的？

Core Viewpoint - The new policy regarding the sealing of drug-related administrative detention records, effective from January 1, aims to balance legal progress with humanistic care, addressing the issue of lifelong restrictions for minor offenses [1][3]. Group 1: Supportive Opinions - Supporters argue that the policy reflects legal progress and humanistic concern, breaking the cycle of "one-time offense, lifelong limitation" [3]. - Data indicates that from 2019 to 2023, public security agencies handled 40.35 million cases, averaging 8.07 million cases annually, suggesting that over 800 million individuals face administrative penalties each year, most of which are minor violations [3]. Group 2: Opposing Opinions - Critics express concerns about public safety, fairness, and the deterrent effect of penalties, fearing that the policy may "tolerate violations" and provide "green lights" for specific groups [4]. - There is a public worry that sealing drug records may infringe on community safety, with fears of "hidden risks" and a potential reduction in police reporting of celebrity drug cases, which could weaken societal deterrence [4]. Group 3: Media Response - Mainstream media aims to clarify misconceptions, emphasizing that "sealing" does not equate to "deletion," as records remain intact within the public security system and can still be accessed by relevant authorities for specific purposes [8][9]. - Experts highlight that the sealing of records is intended to protect all individuals equally and represents a shift from severe penalties to a more civilized legal approach [9]. - Media outlets raise critical questions regarding the implications of sealing records, such as its potential impact on deterrence and the need for strict regulations on who can access sealed records [9].