谈判不欢而散，瑞士拒绝做第二个日本，中国对美国乘胜追击

Group 1 - The core issue in the recent trade negotiations between the US and Switzerland was Switzerland's refusal to comply with a significant US demand regarding investment allocation [1][5] - Initially, the negotiations were progressing well, with the US planning to reduce tariffs from 39% to 15% and Switzerland agreeing to invest $200 billion, particularly in US manufacturing [3] - The turning point occurred when the US Commerce Department demanded that Switzerland not only fulfill its investment commitment but also grant the US government control over $100 billion of that investment [5] Group 2 - Switzerland's firm stance against the US demand highlights the structural resistance to the US's investment-for-tariff strategy in countries other than Japan, indicating potential challenges to US global strategy [7] - The US's approach, which includes introducing clauses that could disrupt agreements, aims to reshape global trade dynamics but faces significant obstacles, especially in Southeast Asia [7] - China's rapid and assertive response to agreements signed by Malaysia and Cambodia reflects its commitment to protecting regional cooperation and economic sovereignty, contrasting with the US's more aggressive tactics [9] Group 3 - Indonesia's rejection of US-led terms is particularly noteworthy, as it signifies the limitations of US economic pressure on medium-sized economies, revealing a shift in global trade dynamics [11] - The collective resistance from countries like Switzerland and Indonesia suggests a fundamental transformation in global trade patterns, challenging the notion of US hegemony [13] - The evolving landscape indicates a move towards a more multipolar world where multiple powers influence international trade, rather than a single dominant force [13]