A股医美龙头财务造假退市 市值蒸发9成 停牌前连续5天涨停

Core Viewpoint - *ST Suwu, a leading player in the A-share medical beauty sector, has been forced to delist due to significant financial fraud, with its stock price plummeting over 90% this year [2][3]. Group 1: Delisting Announcement - On December 1, *ST Suwu received a delisting decision from the Shanghai Stock Exchange, with its stock entering a delisting adjustment period on December 9, 2025, and the last trading day expected to be December 29, 2025 [3]. - The core reason for the delisting was the violation of major laws, as identified in a penalty decision from the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) regarding false disclosures in annual reports from 2020 to 2023 [3][4]. Group 2: Financial Misconduct - The CSRC's decision highlighted three main issues: concealing changes in actual control, severe financial fraud, and hiding fund occupation [5][6]. - *ST Suwu inflated its reported revenue and profits through non-commercial transactions with related companies, resulting in inflated revenues of 4.95 billion, 4.69 billion, 4.31 billion, and 3.77 billion from 2020 to 2023, representing 26.46%, 26.39%, 21.26%, and 16.82% of reported revenues respectively [6][7]. Group 3: Consequences and Penalties - The CSRC imposed a fine of 10 million on *ST Suwu and 15 million on its actual controller, Qian Qunshan, who also received a 10-year ban from the securities market [7]. - The company and its responsible personnel faced public condemnation from the Shanghai Stock Exchange, with Qian Qunshan deemed unsuitable to serve as a director or senior executive for 10 years [7]. Group 4: Operational Challenges - Prior to the delisting, *ST Suwu faced multiple operational challenges, including warnings about potential delisting due to stock prices falling below 1 yuan [8]. - The company was embroiled in a dispute over exclusive sales rights for the AestheFill product, which further strained its financial performance [8][9]. Group 5: Market Impact and Industry Insights - The ongoing legal disputes and operational difficulties have led to significant revenue declines, with a reported 63.93% drop in revenue to 1.48 billion and a net profit loss of 0.43 billion in Q3 2025 [10][11]. - The case serves as a cautionary tale for the medical beauty industry, highlighting the risks associated with agency models and the importance of transparent governance [11].