“董事长反对自己当选董事长”，年薪达435万元为何仍不满？本人回应

Core Viewpoint - The chairman of Absen, Ding Yanhui, expressed dissatisfaction with the company's governance structure and compensation mechanisms, indicating a need for reform, which he initiated by voting against his own re-election as chairman [1][3][6]. Group 1: Governance and Compensation Issues - Ding Yanhui's opposition to his re-election was framed as a protest against the company's compensation structure, which he described as "unscientific, unreasonable, and incomplete" [3][6]. - The company reported a significant increase in Ding's pre-tax compensation to 4.3556 million yuan in 2024, which raised public skepticism about his motives for opposing his own salary [3][5]. - Ding emphasized the need for a comprehensive review of the company's overall compensation system, suggesting that discussions about his salary could lead to broader reforms [6][7]. Group 2: Company Performance and Shareholding Structure - Absen's main business involves providing a full range of LED display products and professional audiovisual solutions, with 2024 revenues reported at 3.663 billion yuan, a decline of 8.58% year-on-year, and a net profit of 117 million yuan, down 62.98% [5]. - The company's performance showed improvement in the first three quarters of the year, with revenues of 2.872 billion yuan and a net profit of 185 million yuan, reflecting year-on-year growth of 5.66% and 57.33%, respectively [5]. - The shareholding structure is concentrated among three founders, with Ding holding 33.78%, which complicates governance and decision-making processes [8][9]. Group 3: Reform Initiatives and Challenges - Ding acknowledged that internal reforms face significant resistance due to the current shareholding structure, which limits decision-making efficiency [8][10]. - He proposed that if the other major shareholders were to reduce their stakes, it could facilitate necessary reforms and improve the company's governance [10][11]. - Ding indicated that if reforms could not be implemented, he might resign from his position as chairman, highlighting the urgency of addressing these governance issues [11][12].